We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Other uncategorised cookies are those that are being analysed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
Trade shows still work. Exhibitors and their leadership teams believe in the channel, and value it more than they did before the pandemic. But this research, conducted with Exhibitor Advocate and Exhibitor Magazine, surfaces a squeeze that has only intensified since: exhibitors are caught between rising costs they attribute to the industry itself, and top-down pressure to cut budgets.
The bind is that the channel they believe in is the one they find hardest to defend. Exhibitors know exhibitions deliver value; they cannot quantify it well enough to protect the budget. When 94% expect to change their programme within three years and cost is the deciding factor, the shows that cannot evidence their worth are the ones that get cut.
Download the full report ↓

71% are satisfied with trade shows as a marketing channel, 67% as a sales channel. Seven in ten agree their leadership sees exhibits as a valuable, irreplaceable part of the marketing mix.
Above previous experience at the show, above expected lead quality, above every other consideration. 82% of those planning to exhibit at fewer shows cited exhibit-related costs as a factor.
67% say exhibit-related costs are rising faster than other costs in their organisation. They attribute this to venue costs, contractor fees and organiser fees, not to inflation, energy prices or wider economic pressures.
Yet relatively few are working directly with exhibition organisers (28%) or their own leadership (24%) to find solutions, the two groups they are caught between.
43% cite difficulty demonstrating exhibit value as a top-three internal challenge over the next three years.
Attendee objectives, buying-cycle information and profiling data are rated as highly important but poorly available. The gap is widest on buying cycles: 79% say it matters, 29% rate its availability as good.
Most anticipate redistributing spend, exhibiting at different events, and cutting per-event spend. Only 15% expect to increase per-event spend.
Digital survey of exhibit leaders, January 2023, conducted in partnership with Exhibitor Advocate and Exhibitor Magazine. 98% of respondents held decision-making power or advisory influence over trade show participation. Respondents spanned manufacturing, medical, fashion, energy and other sectors, and organisations from under 25 to over 5,000 employees.
Standardised exhibitor and visitor benchmarks going back to 2017.
Explori runs bespoke research programmes for organisations that need to answer a specific question about their events or their market. If this kind of evidence would be useful in your business, our Managed Services team can design and run it.